Musings of a Marketing Maven

Christine Thompson> What's on my mind: life and work

Musings of a Marketing Maven random header image

Social Media Marketing, Enterprise Style

March 18th, 2009

After wrestling with taxes and Sched­ule C arcana, it’s a relief to blog. (I’m sure the IRS would pre­fer my cre­ative ener­gies go elsewhere…!)

While work­ing with a client on ini­tial strate­gies for social media mar­ket­ing, I keep being reminded of how much murkier the B2B social media land­scape is. Almost all the pun­dits you talk to have cut their teeth in the con­sumer mar­ket­place, and all their exam­ples focus on mega brands like the iPhone or Nike. Things just aren’t the same in the enter­prise soft­ware marketplace.

In my client’s case the con­ver­sa­tional vol­ume is quite low: in a 30-day period there are just hun­dreds of men­tions of their prod­uct cat­e­gory across the blo­gos­phere, and even fewer of their cor­po­rate brand. And only dozens of men­tions of their cor­po­rate brand in con­junc­tion with the prod­uct cat­e­gory. Need­less to say, they need more buzz…

Start with a Lis­ten­ing Strategy

A key moti­va­tion for my client is to share their “thought lead­er­ship” with busi­ness lead­ers and opin­ion influ­encers in their mar­ket­place. They’ve got lots to say, the sub­ject mat­ter is com­plex, and the impli­ca­tions can be mis­sion crit­i­cal for their customers.

How best to engage is a burn­ing ques­tion. With roots deeply entrenched in long-form media (such as books and long arti­cles), they’re try­ing to envi­sion the right bal­ance of publishing-style approaches and the social media dialog.

Like most tech­nol­ogy com­pa­nies, it’s hard for them to push plat­form con­sid­er­a­tions to the back­ground so they can focus on audi­ence, busi­ness objec­tives and com­mu­ni­ca­tions goals first. They employ lots of smart peo­ple, and tend to get tan­gled up in how to com­mu­ni­cate (which blog­ging tools to use, which plat­forms to lever­age) rather than what to say, to whom, and where. (They’ve even got a cadre of folks who want to cre­ate a next-gen social media platform.)

They’re updat­ing cor­po­rate poli­cies, elim­i­nat­ing many of the “thou shalt not’s,” and try­ing to imag­ine how best to incent the peo­ple they’d most like blog­ging on the company’s behalf.

For­tu­nately, they’ve been read­ing Forrester’s social media reports and talk­ing with lis­ten­ing plat­form ven­dors (which is how they know how low the con­ver­sa­tional vol­ume is at present). Like most B2B mar­ket­ing orga­ni­za­tions, they’re cop­ing with a lean staff and too much on their plate already. They don’t have the man­power to search all the blogs and other social media on a reg­u­lar basis using brute force methods.

Brute Force, or Automated?

The engi­neers on board have enthu­si­as­ti­cally demon­strated the many tools that can be used to search the blog post aggre­ga­tors, YouTube, Flickr, Twit­ter, et al. Given capac­ity con­straints the engi­neers’ sug­ges­tions are falling on deaf ears within the mar­ket­ing orga­ni­za­tion. (Think: Mars ver­sus Venus.)

The mar­keters would like to mon­i­tor the buzz, see the pat­terns unfold, and track changes in sen­ti­ment and brand per­cep­tions. (They love the con­cep­tual map­ping of brand asso­ci­a­tions.) On the face of it the claims made by the lead­ing lis­ten­ing plat­form ven­dors (com­pa­nies like Nielsen Buzz­Met­rics and TNS Cym­fony) seem pretty appealing.

But with ser­vice pric­ing in the $50-100K range (and up), they’re fac­ing inter­nal resis­tance and sticker shock. The sci­en­tists and bean coun­ters on the staff won­der how they can jus­tify such a big invest­ment to track activ­ity that’s unlikely to be sta­tis­ti­cally sig­nif­i­cant. So far the replies by the ven­dors rely on jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for vol­umes that are typ­i­cal of B2C com­pa­nies, not B2B spe­cialty play­ers like my client.

It will be inter­est­ing to see how this unfolds, to see if the case can be made on the basis of qual­i­ta­tive ben­e­fits and the value of “direc­tional indicators.”

Tags: ·

2 Comments so far ↓

  • Chris

    John, thanks for your per­spec­tive. I agree that the momen­tum behind the “Buy­er­sphere” con­cept is unstop­pable, even in the B2B arena. My client is indeed going for­ward with some buzz-priming con­cepts (which they tend to view as thought lead­er­ship). It will be inter­est­ing to see which mix of out­reach and lis­ten­ing vehi­cles proves to be most effec­tive for their situation.

  • John Bottom

    Chris­tine — I do like read­ing your blogs. But in this case I won­der why there is a prob­lem. Surely your client doesn’t have to invest heav­ily now. You have done some basic mon­i­tor­ing. Lev­els will surely grow, and while they grow your client can exper­i­ment with var­i­ous social media seeding/participation activ­i­ties. And when vol­ume of com­ment out there reaches a level to sat­isfy the bean coun­ters, you will be bet­ter able to jus­tify an invest­ment that suits the level of activity.

    And regard­less of your suc­cess in cre­at­ing buzz, com­ment lev­els will rise any­way. We have been talk­ing about a “Buy­er­sphere” con­cept for some time, which is basi­cally recog­nis­ing that buyer-to-buyer com­mu­ni­ca­tion is grow­ing in vol­ume rel­a­tive to brand-to-buyer com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Even­tu­ally, it will dwarf it. The Buy­er­sphere is the place where all this goes on (not just social media plat­forms – any­where online where buyer brand pref­er­ences may be influ­enced) and it is grow­ing. Rapidly.

    Your client is for­tu­nate that B2B is behind the B2C wave. They can see B2C suc­cesses and fail­ures while watch­ing their own lev­els in the Buy­er­sphere. And when their time comes to invest, they can do so with sen­si­ble lev­els of knowl­edge and expec­ta­tion. Keep up the good work on the blog!