<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing 2.0: How To</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/04/02/marketing-20-how-to_155/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/04/02/marketing-20-how-to_155/</link>
	<description>Christine Thompson&#62; What&#039;s on my mind: life and work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/04/02/marketing-20-how-to_155/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/04/02/marketing-20-how-to_155/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>John, I agree with your response to the author&#039;s use of &quot;ANGEL&quot; as the acronym for her framework. I love the concepts, but cringe at the saccharin acronym.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I agree with your response to the author&#8217;s use of &#8220;ANGEL&#8221; as the acronym for her framework. I love the concepts, but cringe at the saccharin acronym.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Bottom</title>
		<link>http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/04/02/marketing-20-how-to_155/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>John Bottom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/04/02/marketing-20-how-to_155/#comment-176</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard good things about this book.   I&#039;m sure Ms Carter has some valuable information for us. And I&#039;d hate to say anything bad about IBM. I just wish she wouldn&#039;t try to wrap her ideas up in such a toe-curlingly awful acronym. Kind of takes away the credibility. Anyway, shouldn&#039;t it be ANTSGTMEYCACLARS? Maybe ANGST for short?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard good things about this book.   I&#8217;m sure Ms Carter has some valuable information for us. And I&#8217;d hate to say anything bad about IBM. I just wish she wouldn&#8217;t try to wrap her ideas up in such a toe-curlingly awful acronym. Kind of takes away the credibility. Anyway, shouldn&#8217;t it be ANTSGTMEYCACLARS? Maybe ANGST for short?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

