For years I’ve loved QuickBooks – a tool that made managing my company’s money remarkably pleasant. I used to rave about it to colleagues. But over the past several product releases I’ve become disenchanted; I think Intuit has lost its way, and has lost sight of whose interest it was pursuing.
With its most recent release, QuickBooks Pro 2010, Intuit has convinced me they’ve decided to walk away from their origins as a customer-focused software provider. They used to be a shining example of customer centricity, and now they strike me as having adopted the persona of a me-centered teenager.
Bloatware?
QuickBooks in the early days was a great example of function drives form: like an entry-level BMW, it did what it was designed to do really well, without a lot of frills. And like a 3-series Beamer, it used to offer good handling and very nice performance.
Nowadays (much like current 3-series BMWs) QuickBooks feels sluggish, bloated – perhaps designed by committee or product managers overly incented by up-sell revenues. (More on that shortly.) The UI has gotten encrusted with features, and the snappy performance disappeared years ago.
For Whose Benefit?
I was peeved at having to buy the 2010 version, just to run my accounting system on an upgraded PC with Windows 7. From my research the feature delta between 2008 and 2010 not worth the upgrade price, at least for my business. But this was clearly a case of planned obsolescence, to drive their revenue engine, so I ordered the upgrade.
Starting from the perspective of a reluctant upgrader, now I’m really annoyed — by the multiple ways in which Intuit signals that it no longer cares to invest in processes that learn from customer interactions. As a result they waste my time on processes that benefit them, but not my business.
Since my upgrade a few days ago, I’ve found QuickBooks and the customer experience delivered by Intuit to be on a downward glide path from their previous quality standards. It took several attempts to install without crashing on my high-end Vista PC. The installer’s UI was unreadable at times, so it was not clear when or what to click. After an hour of gnashing my teeth, I finally managed to get the software installed properly.
What’s Wrong with Their CRM?
And then there’s the fairly lengthy registration process. I’ve been a customer for more than a decade, but they still ask the same questions every time I register online – despite the fact they’ve clearly saved my profile in a CRM record somewhere (based on comments from their rep).
Before you can complete the registration process, of course, there’s the dreaded call to a customer service agent to get a “validation code” in order to activate the software. What with hold times and the questions they have to ask, that process took 2 tries and about 10 minutes total. (I gave up the first time: on hold for 4+ minutes with no feedback from their phone system as to whether my call had been disconnected, or was in a queue.)
Annoyingly, the rep asked several questions that I’d previously answered moments before via the registration form. His system was slow so it took him almost 5 minutes to supply the validation code to activate the software. (He was quite embarrassed at our mutual wait.)
To his chagrin and my dismay, QuickBook’s UI on my PC did not work as expected, so we were unable to verify that the activation code was actually installed properly. (So far, so good, but I may discover next week that I have to repeat the validation interaction with a CSR.)
I find myself wondering, why can’t they just complete the activation process electronically, the way everyone else does? There’s no value to the customer in the phone-based process – it simply exposes us to more unwanted service pitches. It’s not a constructive use of our time, although I understand why Intuit wants to put us through this.
Is It Bloatware – or Ad-Ware?
One of the most annoying things about their recent product releases is the way they lard the UI with links to online services they want to pitch you. There’s no obvious cue in the UI (by design, no doubt) to tell you which of the icons on your display represent features already installed, and which are simply “up-sell links.” I can tell it’s going to take a while to learn which icons or screen real estate to avoid…
Today I was forced into an online “wizard interaction” to decline services I’ve declined twice already this week (via the registration process and the rep). What is wrong with these guys?
I already hated the fact that my prior 2008 version would repeatedly try to up-sell me features I’d previously declined – sometimes more than once a quarter. How many times do I have to say no before they stop asking? It looks like this behavior has continued into the 2010 version.
Besides what it implies about Intuit’s unbridled commercialism, what’s so infuriating about these embedded ads is that they interrupt the user’s concentration and workflow. There’s no way to turn them off. They distract us from our task focus. We’re doing our accounting because we have to, not because we love spending our time here.
It appears that Intuit has decided to treat the QuickBooks customer experience as if we had agreed to operate under an “ad-supported” content model. And yet we customers are paying fairly hefty fees to upgrade.
We’re operating under a paid-for content model, so they should stop their “interruption advertising” behavior and let us focus on getting our accounting done, with as few interruptions or distractions as possible.
William Hopkins // Jan 20, 2010 at 8:33 am
Intuit has graduated far beyond a software purveyor. It seems they make far too much money skillfully pitching financial products to customers. When one looks at the massive ripoff of the populace by bankers, insurance companies, and the like, it is no surprise that Intuit wants a piece of that action.. And they are doing it.
In addition, as your blog illustrates quite well, these “upgrades” (there’s an oxymoron for you) are first and foremost designed for the benefit of Intuit and not you. My latest “upgrade” (2010) demands more processing power than any application that operates on my small office LAN.
I’d switch except that my office manager and bookkeeper have been successfully propagandized to think that Intuit and bookkeeping are synonymous and I don’t have the time to persuade them otherwise. I only got it because they pestered me.
Don’t expect improvement without raising some dust. We are being had. We need to object, as you have done. We really ought to vote with our feet.
Cheers.
Christine // Jan 20, 2010 at 10:48 am
Agreed. Your points are well stated. Perhaps I’m too much of an optimist, but I’d like to believe that Intuit is investing in some “listening software,” and is open to acting on the voice of their customers. (They used to be — it was central to their culture.) Wouldn’t it be nice if they redirect their software development back to what suits their customers best?
Scott Gregory // Oct 31, 2009 at 8:57 am
Your comments are very well put. I’ve been blogging about the frustration with the registration process on both the 2009 and 2010 QuickBooks products — details here: http://sn.im/symjp
As a consultant who has worked with QuickBooks for 10+ years, it is very interesting to read this type of feedback and learn these insights you have shared.
I have passed along a link to your post directly to my contact within the QuickBooks product management group. From personal experience, I do know they listen to their customers extensively.
However, it may take them a long time to react to what they hear. The analogy of the cruise ship applies here — they can’t (or choose not to) make changes on a dime for reasons only they know.
With this registration issue in particular, they need to get it resolved, as comments similar to yours are passing across Twitter every day.
Scott Gregory, QuickBooks Specialist
http://www.BetterBottomLine.com