<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Musings of a Marketing Maven &#187; customer experience management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christinethompson-blog.com/tag/customer-experience-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christinethompson-blog.com</link>
	<description>Christine Thompson&#62; What&#039;s on my mind: life and work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:42:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Falling Out of Love with QuickBooks</title>
		<link>http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/10/30/falling-out-of-love-with-quickbooks_308/</link>
		<comments>http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/10/30/falling-out-of-love-with-quickbooks_308/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer experience management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QuickBooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/10/30/falling-out-of-love-with-quickbooks_308/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years I’ve loved QuickBooks – a tool that made managing my company’s money remarkably pleasant. I used to rave about it to colleagues. But over the past several product releases I’ve become disenchanted; I think Intuit has lost its way, and has lost sight of whose interest it was pursuing. No longer customer centered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years I’ve loved QuickBooks – a tool that made managing my company’s money remarkably pleasant. I used to rave about it to colleagues. But over the past several product releases I’ve become disenchanted; I think Intuit has lost its way, and has lost sight of whose interest it was pursuing.</p>
<div class="pullquote_right">No longer customer centered</div>
<p>With its most recent release, QuickBooks Pro 2010, Intuit has convinced me they’ve decided to walk away from their origins as a customer-focused software provider.<span id="more-308"></span> They used to be a shining example of customer centricity, and now they strike me as having adopted the persona of a me-centered teenager.</p>
<h3>Bloatware?</h3>
<p>QuickBooks in the early days was a great example of function drives form: like an entry-level BMW, it did what it was designed to do really well, without a lot of frills. And like a 3-series Beamer, it used to offer good handling and very nice performance.</p>
<p>Nowadays (much like current 3-series BMWs) QuickBooks feels sluggish, bloated – perhaps designed by committee or product managers overly incented by up-sell revenues. (More on that shortly.) The UI has gotten encrusted with features, and the snappy performance disappeared years ago.</p>
<h3>For Whose Benefit?</h3>
<p>I was peeved at having to buy the 2010 version, just to run my accounting system on an upgraded PC with Windows 7. From my research the feature delta between 2008 and 2010 not worth the upgrade price, at least for my business. But this was clearly a case of planned obsolescence, to drive their revenue engine, so I ordered the upgrade.</p>
<div class="pullquote_right">Are they listening?</div>
<p>Starting from the perspective of a reluctant upgrader, now I’m really  annoyed &#8212; by the multiple ways in which Intuit signals that it no longer cares to invest in processes that learn from customer interactions. As a result they waste my time on processes that benefit them, but not my business.</p>
<p>Since my upgrade a few days ago, I’ve found QuickBooks and the customer experience delivered by Intuit to be on a downward glide path from their previous quality standards. It took several attempts to install without crashing on my high-end Vista PC. The installer’s UI was unreadable at times, so it was not clear when or what to click. After an hour of gnashing my teeth, I finally managed to get the software installed properly.</p>
<h3>What’s Wrong with Their CRM?</h3>
<p>And then there’s the fairly lengthy registration process. I’ve been a customer for more than a decade, but they still ask the same questions every time I register online – despite the fact they’ve clearly saved my profile in a CRM record somewhere (based on comments from their rep).</p>
<p>Before you can complete the registration process, of course, there’s the dreaded call to a customer service agent to get a “validation code” in order to activate the software. What with hold times and the questions they have to ask, that process took 2 tries and about 10 minutes total. (I gave up the first time: on hold for 4+ minutes with no feedback from their phone system as to whether my call had been disconnected, or was in a queue.)</p>
<p>Annoyingly, the rep asked several questions that I’d previously answered moments before via the registration form. His system was slow so it took him almost 5 minutes to supply the validation code to activate the software. (He was quite embarrassed at our mutual wait.)</p>
<p>To his chagrin and my dismay, QuickBook’s UI on my PC did not work as expected, so we were unable to verify that the activation code was actually installed properly. (So far, so good, but I may discover next week that I have to repeat the validation interaction with a CSR.)</p>
<p>I find myself wondering, why can’t they just complete the activation process electronically, the way everyone else does? There’s no value to the customer in the phone-based process – it simply exposes us to more unwanted service pitches. It’s not a constructive use of our time, although I understand why Intuit wants to put us through this.</p>
<h3>Is It Bloatware – or Ad-Ware?</h3>
<p>One of the most annoying things about their recent product releases is the way they lard the UI with links to online services they want to pitch you. There’s no obvious cue in the UI (by design, no doubt) to tell you which of the icons on your display represent features already installed, and which are simply “up-sell links.” I can tell it’s going to take a while to learn which icons or screen real estate to avoid…</p>
<p>Today I was forced into an online “wizard interaction” to decline services I’ve declined twice already this week (via the registration process and the rep). What is wrong with these guys?</p>
<p>I already hated the fact that my prior 2008 version would repeatedly try to up-sell me features I’d previously declined – sometimes more than once a quarter. How many times do I have to say no before they stop asking? It looks like this behavior has continued into the 2010 version.</p>
<p>Besides what it implies about Intuit’s unbridled commercialism, what’s so infuriating about these embedded ads is that they interrupt the user’s concentration and workflow. There’s no way to turn them off. They distract us from our task focus. We’re doing our accounting because we have to, not because we love spending our time here.</p>
<p>It appears that Intuit has decided to treat the QuickBooks customer experience as if we had agreed to operate under an “ad-supported” content model. And yet we customers are paying fairly hefty fees to upgrade.</p>
<p>We’re operating under a paid-for content model, so they should stop their “interruption advertising” behavior and let us focus on getting our accounting done, with as few interruptions or distractions as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/10/30/falling-out-of-love-with-quickbooks_308/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customer Experience – No Technology Required</title>
		<link>http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/02/09/customer-experience-no-technology-required_106/</link>
		<comments>http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/02/09/customer-experience-no-technology-required_106/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Back to Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer experience management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/02/09/customer-experience-no-technology-required_106/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delivering a great customer experience does not necessarily require any specialized technology – especially for a small business. Sometimes it’s just a question of getting the basics right, and reinforcing core values with your staff. Take high-end restaurants, for example. Clearly these are businesses that need to deliver great dining experiences, on a repeatable basis. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delivering a great customer experience does not necessarily require any specialized technology – especially for a small business. Sometimes it’s just a question of getting the basics right, and reinforcing core values with your staff.</p>
<p>Take high-end restaurants, for example. Clearly these are businesses that need to deliver great dining experiences, on a repeatable basis. During downturns, when consumers are unusually choosy about where to invest their precious leisure time and money, businesses that deliver great customer experiences will have an advantage over those trapped in the same-old, same-old paradigm.</p>
<p>Here’s the story.</p>
<p><span id="more-106"></span></p>
<p>The other night my husband and I decided to celebrate at an upscale local restaurant… We’d been waiting for the right occasion to dine there for several months, and the moment finally arrived on Saturday. This restaurant business had a well-established brand and reputation for their Seattle location, and had recently opened a second location in nearby Bellevue (within reach of Microsofties and other affluent diners).</p>
<p>Sadly, we were disappointed even before the waiter brought us the bill. Had the customer-facing staff been better trained (and incented?) on basic principles, we would have been thrilled with our dining experience. (True to its reputation, the food itself was great.) But the staff made a number of mistakes when it came to managing a great customer experience. As a result they’ve lost our future business.</p>
<p>Here are some basic principles that enable businesses like this (and yours too?) to delight their customers.</p>
<h3>Get The Basics Right – The Not-So-Secret Sauce for Success</h3>
<ul>
<li>Set expectations that you can meet – and then try to exceed them</li>
<li>Be honest and authentic in your interactions</li>
<li>Ask customers for their preferences, and give them options when you discover that you cannot deliver on your original commitment</li>
<li>Pay attention to your customers and learn how to tell them apart (don’t treat everyone the same)</li>
<li>Don’t spend so much energy trying to maximize what you’re selling (or up-selling) that you lose sight of what’s best for your customer &#8212; if you’re looking for long-term relationships with your customers</li>
</ul>
<h3>What They Got Wrong</h3>
<p>To make this story more concrete, here’s how this restaurant mismanaged our experience, and proved they don’t deserve our future business. These are the basic principles they got wrong.</p>
<p><em>Set expectations you can keep. Be honest.</em></p>
<p>When we called to book a table, they said the earliest they could seat us was 8:30 PM. We agreed, and arrived at the restaurant 5 minutes early. They told us we’d have to wait a bit until our table would be ready. They suggested we wait in the bar until then, and promised to get us in a few moments.</p>
<p>In fact they did not seat us until after well 9:30 PM, more than an hour later. Our meals were delivered closer to 10:30, at which point we were well past starving. Had they been honest about their overbooking when we phoned for a table, we would have gone elsewhere and decided to try again on a different night.</p>
<p>Yes, they would have sacrificed that evening’s revenues for an option on our future business. Instead, they risked their brand – and lost both our future business and any chance of positive referrals.</p>
<p><em>Pay attention to your customers, so you can tell them apart.</em></p>
<p>We waited in the bar area for quite a long time. At least one or two other parties that arrived after us were seated before us.</p>
<p>When the maitre d’ finally came to escort us to our table, she called my husband by the wrong name. Was her inattention to who was who, or our respective positions in the reservation queue, the reason for our long delay before being seated? This question left a poor taste in our mouth as we walked to our table…</p>
<p><em>Ask for preferences, give the customer some options.</em></p>
<p>While waiting, we saw a dozen or more people having dinner at the bar overlooking the open kitchen. No one asked our preferences: to eat right away at the bar, or continue waiting another X minutes for a table to be ready. The cocktail waiter was the only one paying attention to us at that point. It was late, we were hungry, and we didn’t want to overdo the alcohol on empty stomachs.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, there were no complimentary glasses of wine, no “amuse bouche” specialties from the chef to make us feel better about the long wait. (We’ve enjoyed those touches at other upscale restaurants when their service was faltering.)</p>
<p><em>Don’t overly emphasize what you want to sell, at your customer’s expense.</em></p>
<p>The cocktail waiters were, if anything, overly attentive. No capacity issues there…</p>
<p>We’re aware that restaurants earn much of their margins from the markup they impose on alcoholic beverages. This left us wondering if the whole delay had been engineered to persuade us to buy more drinks than we’d intended. Was it deliberate manipulation on their part, or just a series of unthinking blunders? Were they trying to maximize their margin at our expense? (The wine selection was good, but the markup was high.)</p>
<p>On a positive note, the food was indeed delicious, and the waiter provided good advice on their house specialties. But his style was formulaic, and at that hour of the evening, he appeared to be going through the motions rather than focusing on us in any authentic way.</p>
<h3>Beware of Consequences</h3>
<p>So how will we respond to this disappointing experience?</p>
<p>We had been talking to friends about getting together, and booking a large table at this restaurant later this month. Needless to say, we won’t organize a group dinner there any time soon.</p>
<p>I’d also been planning to bring clients to this location for business dinners. But that’s no longer in the cards. I won’t risk bringing clients to a restaurant whose service is so unpredictable.</p>
<p>And because the price tag was quite high, relative to the overall experience delivered, we won’t return. Instead we’ll patronize restaurants that can deliver both great cuisine <em>and</em> memorable dining experiences.</p>
<p>This is a parable for businesses that need to focus on customer experience management, especially in tough times when there isn’t enough consumer money to go around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://christinethompson-blog.com/2009/02/09/customer-experience-no-technology-required_106/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

